Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/BhagyaMani

< Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations

This page has been removed from search engines' indexes.

Contributor copyright investigation

This CCI cleanup subpage has been opened because concerns of multiple point infringement have been substantiated and further steps are necessary to address the serious risk of copyright violation from the listed contributor. Listings are not intended to imply a presumption of bad faith on the part of any contributor, as copyright laws vary widely around the world and many contributors who violate Wikipedia's copyrights policy do so inadvertently through not understanding it or the United States' laws that govern it.

If you are here because of a note on an article's talk page explaining removal of text, please do not restore any removed text without first ensuring that the text does not duplicate, closely paraphrase or plagiarize from a previously published source. You are welcome to use sourced facts that may have been removed to create new content in your own words or to incorporate brief quotations of copyrighted material in accordance with the non-free content policy and guideline.

Instructions

edit

All contributors with no history of copyright problems are welcome to contribute to clean up. Contributors who are the subject of a contributor copyright investigation are among contributors with a history of copyright problems and so are not welcome to contribute to clean up of their own or others' copyright violations.

If contributors have been shown to have a history of extensive copyright violation, it may be assumed without further evidence that all of their major contributions are copyright violations, and they may be removed indiscriminately in accordance with Wikipedia:Copyright violations. Contributors who are the subject of a contributor copyright investigation are among contributors who have been shown to have a history of extensive copyright violation and so all of the below listed contributions may be removed indiscriminately. However, to avoid collateral damage, efforts should be made when possible to verify infringement before removal.

When every section is completed, please alter the listing for this CCI at Wikipedia:CCI#Open_investigations to include the tag "completed=yes". This will alert a clerk that the listing needs to be archived.

  • {{CCI-open|Contributor name|Day Month Year|completed=yes}}

Text

edit
  • Examine the article or the diffs linked below.
  • If the contributor has added creative content, either evaluate it carefully for copyright concerns or remove it.
  • Evaluating for copyright concerns may include checking the listed sources, spot-checking using google, google books and other search engines and looking for major differences in writing style. The background may give some indication of the kinds of copyright concerns that have been previously detected. For older text, mirrors of Wikipedia content may make determining which came first difficult. It may be helpful to look for significant changes to the text after it was entered. Searching for the earlier form of text can help eliminate later mirrors. If you cannot determine which came first, text should be removed presumptively, since there is an established history of copying with the editor in question.
  • If you remove text presumptively, place {{subst:CCI|name=Contributor name}} on the article's talk page.
  • If you specifically locate infringement and remove it (or revert to a previous clean version), place {{subst:cclean}} on the article's talk page. The url parameter may be optionally used to indicate source.
  • If there is insufficient creative content on the page for it to survive the removal of the text or it is impossible to extricate from subsequent improvements, replace it with {{subst:copyvio}}, linking to the investigation subpage in the url parameter. List the article as instructed at the copyright problems board, but you do not need to notify the contributor. Your note on the CCI investigation page serves that purpose.
  • To tag an article created by the contributor for presumptive deletion, place {{subst:copyvio|url=see talk}} on the article's face and {{subst:CCId|name=Contributor name}} on the article's talk page. List the article as instructed at the copyright problems board, but you do not need to notify the contributor.
  • After examining an article:
  • replace the diffs after the colon on the listing with indication of whether problem was found (add {{y}}) or not (add {{n}}). If the article is blanked and may be deleted, please indicate as much after the {{y}}.
  • Follow with your username and the time to indicate to others that the article has been evaluated and appropriately addressed. This is automatically generated by four tildes (~~~~)
  • If a section is complete, consider collapsing it by placing {{collapse top}} and {{collapse bottom}} beneath the section header and after the final listing.

Background

edit

 BhagyaMani

  • At least some of this edit appears to be copy pasted from here.
  • At least some of this edit appears to be copy pasted from here.
  • At least some of this edit appears to be copy pasted from here.
  • At least some of this edit appears to be copy pasted from Banks, D., Davies, C., Gosling, J., Newman, J., Rice, M., Wadley, J., Walravens, F. (2008) Environmental Crime. A threat to our future. Environmental Investigation Agency available here.

I believe there to many more. I've asked the editor to please clean up. He was uncooperative to say the least. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:06, 16 April 2013 (UTC) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:06, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding AF's accusations:
  • definition of "illegal wildlife trade" : already had reworded this definition from various sentences of the publication that I referenced in this particular edit;
  • Persian leopard : revised + extended recently;
  • Sumatran elephant in captivity : revised + extended recently;
  • Egyptian buffalo started : apart from the publication I referenced in this stub, there isn't much trustworthy and reliable info available about this water buffalo breed. However, some rephrasing of the text in the sections is possible and will do this asap.
  • Mai Pokhari started : already had reworded the relevant parts of the publication that I referenced in this particular edit;
  • Bengal florican in Koshi Tappu WR : already had reworded the relevant parts of the referenced publication in this particular edit. Apart from that I suggest you read the copyright statement in this publication!

-- BhagyaMani (talk) 16:43, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[1]. MER-C 12:26, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Contribution survey

edit

BhagyaMani (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

This report covers contributions to 234 articles from timestamp 2008-02-24 15:06:21 UTC to timestamp 2013-04-19 09:37:50 UTC.

Articles 1 through 20

edit

Articles 21 through 40

edit

Articles 41 through 60

edit

Articles 61 through 80

edit

Articles 81 through 100

edit

Articles 101 through 120

edit

Articles 121 through 140

edit

Articles 141 through 160

edit

Articles 161 through 180

edit
Extended content

Articles 181 through 200

edit
Extended content

Articles 201 through 220

edit
Extended content

Articles 221 through 234

edit

This report generated by Contribution Surveyor at 2013-04-19T12:17:45+00:00 in 0.21 sec.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Contributor_copyright_investigations/BhagyaMani&oldid=1276256106"