Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inside Towers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 09:11, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Inside Towers

Inside Towers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of any notability. One edit summary says "added a secondary source to appease the general notability guideline" but it doesn't even do that. Fails WP:GNG  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   23:24, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:43, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:13, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07 (T) 00:05, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

• Delete - Subject is only mentioned in passing in a couple reliable sources, thus not notable. Meatsgains (talk) 18:28, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.